next up previous contents
Next: Poisson homogeneous spaces Up: Poisson actions Previous: Poisson actions   Contents

Poisson actions


\begin{defn}
Let $(\gerg, \dl)$\ be a Lie bialgebra. Let $(M, \Pi)$\ be a Poisso...
...\Pi = \rho^{\land 2}(\dl(X)),\quad \forall\; X\in \gerg
\end{equation}\end{defn}

\begin{remark}
% latex2html id marker 7296\mbox{}
\begin{enumerate}
\item $\Pi...
...at (\ref{infinitesimal_Poisson_action})
is verified.
\end{enumerate}\end{remark}
Let now $\phi\: G\times M\to M$ be a Lie group action. Let us fix the following notations

\begin{displaymath}
\phi(g, x)=g\cdot x
\end{displaymath}


\begin{displaymath}
\forall\; g\in G,\quad \phi_g\: M\to M,\quad x\mapsto g\cdot x
\end{displaymath}


\begin{displaymath}
\forall\; x\in M,\quad \phi_x\: G\to M,\quad g\mapsto g\cdot x
\end{displaymath}

Remark that

\begin{displaymath}
\phi_{g\cdot x}=\phi_x R_g,\quad \phi_g\phi_x = \phi_x L_g.
\end{displaymath}

For $f\in\Coo(M)$ let $\th_f\: M\to \gerg^*$ be defined by

\begin{displaymath}
\th_f(x) = d_g f(g\cdot x)\big\vert _{g=e}
\end{displaymath}

If we have only the infinitesimal action we can define equivalently

\begin{displaymath}
\scalar{\th_f}{Y} = \rho(Y)f
\end{displaymath}


\begin{thm}[Semonov-Tian-Shanskii]
Let $(G, \Pi_G)$\ be a connected, simply conn...
...and 2}(\dl(X)),\quad \forall X\in\gerg
\end{displaymath}\end{enumerate}\end{thm}

\begin{proof}
$(1) \Longleftrightarrow (2)$\ by definition of product Poisson st...
...ected any open neighbourhood generates it and the
theorem is proven.
\end{proof}

\begin{remark}
\mbox{}
\begin{enumerate}
\item $\phi$\ does not preserve $\Pi_M$...
... is an invariant bivector (not necessarily Poisson).
\end{enumerate}\end{remark}

We can give a slightly different look on conditions (3)-(4).

\begin{displaymath}
\th\:\Om^1(M)\to \Coo(M; \gerg^*)\in \gX(M)\tensor \Coo(M;\gerg^*)
\end{displaymath}

Recall the Poisson coboundary introduced in ([*]).

\begin{displaymath}
d_{\Pi}\:\gX^p(M)\to \gX^{p+1}(M),\quad d_{\Pi}(P)=[\Pi, P]
\end{displaymath}


\begin{displaymath}
(d_{\Pi}X)(df, dg)=(L_X\Pi)(df, dg)=X\poiss{f}{g}-\poiss{Xf}{g}
-\poiss{f}{Xg}
\end{displaymath}

Therefore LHS of (3) can be rewritten as

\begin{displaymath}
(d_{\Pi}\th)(df, dg)
\end{displaymath}

and phrased with suitable conventions as

\begin{displaymath}
(d_{\Pi}\th - \half[\th, \th])(df, dg)=0
\end{displaymath}

i.e. $\th$ satisfies a Maurer-Cartan type of equation.
\begin{prop}
Let $(\gerg, \dl)$\ be a Lie bialgebra with an infinitesimal Poisso...
...\gh^{\perp}$, then $\gh^{\perp}$\ is a Lie subalgebra.
\end{enumerate}\end{prop}

\begin{proof}
Let $f, g\in\Coo(M)^{\gh}$. This means that for any $X\in \gh$,
$...
...nd $\gh^{\perp}$\ is generated by such elements. Thus the statement.
\end{proof}

\begin{cor}
If $\gh \setminus M$\ is a smooth manifold then it posesses
a Poisson structure and $p\: M\to \gh \setminus M$
is a Poisson map.
\end{cor}

\begin{cor}
If we have a global action and a closed connected subgroup $H$
such ...
...rp}$\ is a Lie subalgebra then the same
holds true for $H\setminus M$.
\end{cor}


next up previous contents
Next: Poisson homogeneous spaces Up: Poisson actions Previous: Poisson actions   Contents
Pawel Witkowski 2006-06-26