Next: Case 2
Up: The Wodzicki residue
Previous: The Wodzicki residue
Contents
Suppose
. Then
, and
is homogeneous of degree greater than
, so
is homogeneous of degree
. These terms have no failure
of homogeneity.
Before examining the other two cases, we return to the context of
functions on
, and look first at
. Since
(
) holds with
for
, and since
, we get
or more simply,
 |
(23) |
Notice that
is a constant, because
is
rotation-invariant. Substituting
in (
)
gives
 |
(24) |
so that
``diverges logarithmically''. We can suppress the
constant term if we replace
by
,
since we must then subtracting the constant
from the inverse
Fourier transform.
For
, we define
. A similar analysis
shows that
, where both
and
are homogeneous of degree
. In this case,
remains bounded as
.
We now return to the examination of the terms
in the
integral kernel
.
Next: Case 2
Up: The Wodzicki residue
Previous: The Wodzicki residue
Contents
Pawel Witkowski
2006-03-14