next up previous contents
Next: Spectral Growth and Dixmier Up: Dirac operators Previous: The Schrödinger-Lichnerowicz formula   Contents

The spectral growth of the Dirac operator

Since $\Dslash^2 = \Dl^S + \quarter s$, and $\Dl^S$ is closely related to the Laplacian $\Dl$ on the (compact, boundaryless) Riemannian manifold $(M, g)$, the general features of $\spec(\Dslash)$ may be deduced from those of $\spec(\Dl)$.

We require two main properties of Laplacians on compact Riemannian manifolds without boundary. Recall that

\begin{displaymath}
\Dl = -\Tr_g(\nb^{T^*M\ox T^*M}\circ\nb^{T^*M})
= - g^{ij} (\del_i \del_j - \Ga_{ij}^k \del_k)
\end{displaymath}

is the local expression for the Laplacian (which depends on $g$ through the Levi-Civita connection and $g^{ij}$). Thus $\Dl$ is a second order differential operator on $\Coo(M)$.


\begin{fact}
The Laplacian $\Dl$ extends to a positive selfadjoint operator
on ...
... --also denoted by $\Dl$-- and $(1 + \Dl)$ has a
compact inverse.
\end{fact}

To make $\Dl$ selfadjoint, we must complete $\Coo(M)$ to a larger domain, by defining

\begin{displaymath}
\snorm{f}^2 := \braket{f}{(1 + \Dl)f}
= \Vert f\Vert^2 + g^{ij} \braket{\del_i f}{\del_j f},
\end{displaymath}

where $\braket{f}{f} := \int_M \vert f\vert^2 \nu_g$. Taking $\Dom\Dl := \set{f \in L^2(M,\nu_g) : \snorm{f} < \infty}$, $\Dl$ becomes selfadjoint and $(1 + \Dl)^{-1}\: L^2(M,\nu_g) \to (\Dom\Dl, \snorm{\cdot})$ is bounded. Then one shows that the inclusion $(\Dom\Dl, \snorm{\cdot}) \hookto L^2(M,\nu_g)$ is a compact operator (by Rellich's theorem); and $(1 + \Dl)^{-1}$, as a bounded operator on $L^2(M,\nu_g)$, is then the composition of these two, so it is also compact.


\begin{cor}
$\Dl$ has discrete (point) spectrum of finite multiplicity.
\end{cor}


\begin{proof}
Since $(1 + \Dl)^{-1}$ is compact, its spectrum --except for $0$...
...la_k \to \infty$, since
$(1 + \la_k)^{-1} \to 0$, as $k \to \infty$.
\end{proof}

As a convention, when $A$ is a compact positive operator, we write $\la_k(A)$ to denote the $k$-th eigenvalue of $A$ in decreasing order (with multiplicity): $\la_0(A) \geq \la_1(A) \geq\cdots$; on the other hand, if $A$ is an unbounded positive selfadjoint operator with compact inverse, we write the eigenvalues in increasing order, as we did for $\Dl$.


\begin{fact}[Weyl's theorem]
The \textit{counting function} for $\spec(\Dl)$ is...
...}where $\Omega_n = \Vol(\bS^{n-1}) = 2 \pi^{n/2}/\Ga(\tfrac{n}{2})$.
\end{fact}

We shall not prove Weyl's theorem, in particular why the number of eigenvalues (up to $\la$) is proportional to $\Vol(M)$, but we shall compute the constant by considering an example. For a simple and clear exposition of the proof, we recommend Higson's ICTP lectures [Hig].


\begin{example}
Take $M = \bT^n = \bR^n/bZ^n$ to be the $n$-torus with unit
vol...
...ega_n \int_0^1 r^{n-1}  dr = \frac{\Omega_n}{n}.
\end{displaymath}\end{example}

For the spinor Laplacian $\Dl^S$, a similar estimate holds, but with $C_n$ replaced by $2^m C_n$ (recall that in the flat torus case with untwisted spin structure, $\sS \isom \Coo(\bT^n) \ox \bC^{2^m}$). Now by Lichnerowicz' formula, $\Dslash^2$ differs from $\Dl^S$ by a bounded multiplication operator $\quarter s$, thus $N_{\Dslash^2}(\la) \sim N_{\Dl^S}(\la)$ as $\la\to\infty$, hence

\begin{displaymath}
N_{\Dslash^2}(\la)
\sim \frac{2^m \Omega_n}{n(2\pi)^n}  \Vol(M)  \la^{n/2},
\as \la \to \infty.
\end{displaymath}

Consider the positive operator $\vert\Dslash\vert := (\Dslash^2)^{1/2}$; remember that $\mu$ is an eigenvalue for $\vert\Dslash\vert$ if and only if $\mu^2$ is an eigenvalue for $\Dslash^2$ (with the same multiplicity). We arrive at the following estimate.


\begin{cor}
\begin{displaymath}
N_{\vert\Dslash\vert}(\la) \sim
\frac{2^m \Omeg...
...^n}  \Vol(M)  \la^n, \as \la \to \infty.
\eqno \qed
\end{displaymath}\end{cor}


\begin{example}
For $M = \bS^2$, with $n = 2$, we have seen (in Appendix A.2) th...
... and) the growth of the spectrum of the Dirac
operator on $\bS^2$.
\end{example}


next up previous contents
Next: Spectral Growth and Dixmier Up: Dirac operators Previous: The Schrödinger-Lichnerowicz formula   Contents
Pawel Witkowski 2006-03-14