Since
, and
is closely related
to the Laplacian
on the (compact, boundaryless) Riemannian
manifold
, the general features of
may be
deduced from those of
.
We require two main properties of Laplacians on compact Riemannian
manifolds without boundary. Recall that
To make
selfadjoint, we must complete
to a larger
domain, by defining
As a convention, when
is a compact positive operator,
we write
to denote the
-th eigenvalue of
in
decreasing order (with multiplicity):
; on the other hand, if
is an
unbounded positive selfadjoint operator with compact inverse, we
write the eigenvalues in increasing order, as we did for
.
We shall not prove Weyl's theorem, in particular why the number of
eigenvalues (up to
) is proportional to
, but we shall
compute the constant by considering an example. For a simple and clear
exposition of the proof, we recommend Higson's ICTP
lectures [Hig].
For the spinor Laplacian
, a similar estimate holds, but with
replaced by
(recall that in the flat torus case with
untwisted spin structure,
). Now
by Lichnerowicz' formula,
differs from
by a
bounded multiplication operator
, thus
as
, hence