Next: Epilogue: counting the spin
Up: The spin connection
Previous: The spin connection
Contents
From now on, we assume that
is an open chart domain
over which the tangent and cotangent bundles are trivial. Local
coordinates are functions
, and we denote
for the local basis of
vector fields; by definition, their Lie brackets vanish:
. We define the Christoffel symbols
by
The explicit expression (
) for the Levi-Civita
connection reduces to a local formula over
, namely
![\begin{displaymath}
\Ga_{ij}^k
:= \half g^{kl}(\del_i g_{jl} + \del_j g_{il} - \del_l g_{ij});
\quad\word{here} [g^{rs}] = [g_{ij}]^{-1}.
\end{displaymath}](img687.png) |
(10) |
Notice that
; this is beacuse of torsion
freedom.
Dually, the coefficients of the Levi-Civita connection on
-forms
are
(note the change of sign):
Since the Riemannian metric gives a concept of (fibrewise)
orthogonality on the tangent and cotangent bundles, we can select
local orthonormal bases:
We rewrite the Christoffel symbols in these local bases:
Metric compatibility means that, for each fixed
, the
are skewsymmetric matrices:
Thus
lies in
.
Before discussing existence, let us look first at local formulas. We
thus write ``
locally'' for the Levi-Civita
connection, with an implicit choice of local orthonormal bases of
-forms. We recall that there are isomorphisms of Lie algebras
with the property that
for
;
in other words,
for
--this is a
commutator for the Clifford product in
. On the
chart domain
, we can apply
to
fibrewise;
this means that
for
with support in
,
is mapped to
, and
again denotes the
Clifford action action of
on
.
In this way we get the local expression of a connection,
 |
(11) |
Suppose we take
with support in
, and
. Then
Thus
provides a local solution to the
existence of
satisfying the
Leibniz rule:
Physicists like to write
for a given local
orthonormal basis of
--so that the
are
fixed matrices. For convenience, we also write
also (in the Euclidean signature,
which we are always using here); in other words,
but with its index lowered for use with the Einstein summation
convention. Thus the Clifford relations are just
The formula (
) for
can now be
rewritten as
A more sensible notation arrives by introducing matrix-valued
functions
as follows:
Let us look at the calculation (
) again, after
contracting with a vectorfield
. We get
Thus the local coefficients of
are
, for
.
Now suppose
comes from a spin structure on
. Since
for
, the operator
acts locally (as a field of antilinear conjugations
); and since
for
,
we get, for
:
Thus
vanishes over
, provided
is real.
Suppose that
is another local connection defined on
and satisfying the Leibniz rule
(
) there. Then
and
for all
.
Thus
is a scalar matrix in
, for each
. To
fix
, we ask that both
and
be Hermitian
connections; this entails that each
is skew-hermitian:
so this scalar is purely imaginary. On the other hand, if
, like
, commutes with
whenever the coefficients
of
are real functions, then this scalar must be purely real.
Therefore,
.
If
is any connection on an
-module
, then
for
, so that
is tensorial:
for a
certain
-form
, the curvature
of
. For the Levi-Civita connection, a local calculation gives
which yields the local expression for the Riemannian curvature tensor:
Likewise, the curvature
of the spin connection is
locally given by
One can check these formulas to get more familiar expressions by
computing
and likewise
, for
.
Next: Epilogue: counting the spin
Up: The spin connection
Previous: The spin connection
Contents
Pawel Witkowski
2006-03-14